Skip to content

Use dependabot to check for updates in JSON Schema test suite #250

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

OptimumCode
Copy link
Owner

Did not think that it was possible until I found the json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite#549

@OptimumCode OptimumCode added the repository enhancement Changes to make the repository look better label Feb 7, 2025
@OptimumCode OptimumCode merged commit 1cafd64 into main Feb 7, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
@OptimumCode OptimumCode deleted the dependabot-for-test-suit-update branch February 7, 2025 16:52
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.55%. Comparing base (33b1991) to head (3591bed).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #250   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.55%   90.55%           
=======================================
  Files         133      133           
  Lines        3983     3983           
  Branches     1059     1059           
=======================================
  Hits         3607     3607           
  Misses         82       82           
  Partials      294      294           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'KMP JSON schema validator'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.

Benchmark suite Current: 3591bed Previous: 33b1991 Ratio
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateBasic ( {"objectPath":"openapi.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 4963.891181927711 us/op 2226.077797887324 us/op 2.23
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateBasic ( {"objectPath":"openapi-invalid.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 3882.5867056250004 us/op 1574.5893872311829 us/op 2.47
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateDetailed ( {"objectPath":"openapi.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 7273.684407526882 us/op 3272.9041535825545 us/op 2.22
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateDetailed ( {"objectPath":"openapi-invalid.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 9902.915175308643 us/op 4675.814434523809 us/op 2.12
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateFlag ( {"objectPath":"openapi.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 2101.51256553288 us/op 1092.8676436873745 us/op 1.92
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateFlag ( {"objectPath":"openapi-invalid.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 1.5339310954101222 us/op 0.6570435924678528 us/op 2.33
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateVerbose ( {"objectPath":"openapi.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 12716.139726136364 us/op 6478.547104580152 us/op 1.96
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validateVerbose ( {"objectPath":"openapi-invalid.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 12537.322846153844 us/op 6597.075485276075 us/op 1.90
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validate ( {"objectPath":"openapi.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 2887.991427793696 us/op 1309.4274417852523 us/op 2.21
macosArm64.CommonAvgTimeBench.validate ( {"objectPath":"openapi-invalid.json","schemaPath":"openapi_schema.json"} ) 2811.4647543325527 us/op 1357.21171824147 us/op 2.07

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

CC: @OptimumCode

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
repository enhancement Changes to make the repository look better
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant